Indirect Gold ShipmentsIt was also not uncommon for bankers to purchase gold in one market to satisfy their obligations in another. Indirect Gold Shipments - Beside the "direct" gold exports and imports described above, there is still another kind of gold movement which, for lack of a better term, may be styled "indirect." Reference is made to the kind of operation which takes place, for instance, when New York ships gold to Paris, has the resulting balance transferred from Paris to London, and then draws and sells drafts on London. Another kind of indirect operation is where some market like London, for example, owing large amounts in South America and happening to have large balances in New York, arranges to have payment made direct from New York in the form of gold. Methods of moving gold. - Turning from the discussion of reasons why gold moves from one country to another, shipments may be divided into two broad classes, direct and indirect. In the first case the gold is shipped straight to the point to which it is desired to transfer the balance. In the other case the gold is shipped to some third place for the purpose of buying exchange upon the place to which the balance is actually to be transferred. ... Banking Practice and Foreign Exchange But enough has been written to indicate the laws that control the movement of gold in settlement of international balances. The gold, however, is not always shipped directly to the country to which we owe it. For instance, we may be indebted to Germany, but ship to France, because Germany owes a balance to that country, and a shipment to France thus satisfies two debts at once. Or we may owe England, but ship to France, because England is willing to lend money there. Thus we hear of a "triangular transaction" in exchange, which is a movement involving three countries.2 [Emphasis supplied.] Common and contemporaneous examples of triangular transactions and indirect gold shipments were the frequent exports of U. S. gold coin from New York to Argentina for English account. Gold Shipments to Argentina Of the many other ways in which gold moves, one way seems to be becoming so increasingly important that it is well worthy of attention. Reference is made to the shipment of gold from New York to the Argentine for account of English bankers who have debts to discharge there. Elements of Foreign Exchange, 2nd Ed., Franklin Escher And, an example transaction of this indirect shipment . . . An engagement of $500,000 gold coin on Thursday [January 7, 1909] from New York to Argentina was announced this week; later $1,000,000 gold coin was engaged to Paris [as a part of the January 8th engagements]. The London cables reported a withdrawal of $5,000,000 for shipment [from London] to Argentina, which had the effect of imparting a firm tone to the London discount market. It appears that an Argentine bond issue of 17 1/2 million dollars is pending in London, as the result of which, and also of London's participation in the Russian loan, discounts may possibly be advanced next week at least to 3%. The Commercial and Financial Chronicle, Jan. 9, 09, 71:1. A slightly later transaction:
COIN FOR ARGENTINA $1,000,000 Worth of American
New York Evening Sun, January 27, 1909, 1:4 But, ... Far and way the most important of such "indirect movements" are those in which gold is shipped from New York to Paris for the sake of creating a credit balance in London. ... Elements of Foreign Exchange, 2nd Ed., Franklin Escher English bankers had gold shipped from New York to Argentina to offset the indebtedness which they had incurred as a result, in part, of Argentine loans placed in the English market. A Russian loan closed on January 22, 1909. French bankers, too, as a result of the Russian loan placed primarily in Paris, would have had to ship gold to Russia. In fact, the gold purchased by French banking interests in New York, discussed in detail later, was, by their own press release, engaged for this specific purpose. | |
FOOTNOTES1Foreign Exchange Explained, Franklin Escher, MacMillan Co., New York (1917), pgs 81-82. | |
. . |